Mobile Service GeoFences

Client
-
Ford Service Reservations+ (FSR+)
Product Design
-
Ken Villapando, Matthieu Reed
Strategy
-
Chris Walker
Duration
-
9+ Months

Problem

As Mobile Service scaled, dealerships needed a way to manage growing fleets of service vans and define where each van could operate. Without a centralized, visual interface, assigning vans to coverage areas was manual, inconsistent, and prone to overlap or service gaps. Advisors also lacked visibility into where technicians were at any given moment — making routing and rescheduling a constant challenge.

My Role 🖋️

As the senior product designer, I partnered closely with strategy, stakeholders, and our development team in India to guide the project end-to-end. I created and presented a vision deck that secured stakeholder buy-in for a net-new map feature, ultimately influencing its inclusion in the 2025 product roadmap.

Working within Pega’s platform limitations and cross-time-zone collaboration challenges, I focused on designing solutions and collaborated with dev to come up with hi-fidelity comps that were both technically feasible and impactful for dealers while meeting tight deadlines.

A tablet and mobile screen of Ford Mobile Service GeoFence feature on a dark background. They sit floating above a mobile service van with a plotted geofence.

Solution ☑️

We introduced a net-new map view that allowed dealerships to visually draw geofences and assign them to specific service vans, helping organize territories with clarity and flexibility. Layered with real-time technician location tracking, this feature empowered advisors to make faster decisions, reduce overlap, and optimize technician coverage across their service areas.

Business Objectives & KPI’s for 2025

Deliver

2.3m

experiences with 4,300 Mobile Service Units on the road

Launch

513

dealers by the end of the year

Above

2.15+

Mobile Service Reservations per Van per Day, exceeding the national average

Approach 📐

Stakeholder buy-in

Secured alignment that a map feature was critical to meeting KPIs and business goals. This included pushing back on initial pressure to jump straight into development, and instead convincing stakeholders that user testing was necessary to validate assumptions before investing engineering effort.

User Testing

Conducted four dealer usability tests with lo-fi map views, drawing competitive benchmarking from Strava, Lyft, and BizzyCar. These sessions simulated real scheduling scenarios to uncover how advisors assign and manage mobile service vans.

develop and deliver

Dealer feedback confirmed the need for clarity and flexibility when assigning technicians. These insights shaped high-fidelity designs, ensuring the geofence solution directly supported advisor decision-making.

Lo-Fidelity Comps 📓

For early testing, I created lo-fi map views that focused on layout and functionality while keeping the interface simple. I made the conscious decision to keep these comps in color, as it was essential for dealers to quickly read and comprehend the data on the map. Color coding helped differentiate technicians, routes, and coverage areas, making it easier to simulate real-world scheduling scenarios.

This approach ensured that feedback captured both usability and the effectiveness of visual cues, which informed the next stage of high-fidelity design. It also reinforced stakeholder confidence that our testing would generate actionable insights before committing engineering resources.

Lo-fi comp of GeoFence map viewLo-fi comp of GeoFence map view with a tile selected and flyout that comes from the right

Dealer Interviews

Evansville Ford

Evansville Ford research with sticky notes placed on lo-fi comps

Roy O’ Brian Ford

Roy O' Brian Ford research with sticky notes placed on lo-fi comps

Stiver’s Ford

Stiver's Ford research with sticky notes placed on lo-fi comps

Blue Springs Ford

Blue Springs Ford research with sticky notes placed on lo-fi comps

Synthesis

Theme 1

Stiver's Ford research with sticky notes placed on lo-fi comps

Theme 2

Blue Springs Ford research with sticky notes placed on lo-fi comps

Theme 3

Blue Springs Ford research with sticky notes placed on lo-fi comps

Hi-fidelity ideal state

Development Constraints ⚠️

One of the challenges I faced as a designer was our Pega development system being inflexible when it came to designing custom components. This meant we couldn’t immediately deliver the route optimization feature dealers strongly requested during testing.

Collaborating with product and engineering, we prioritized releasing an MVP that focused on clarity and usability, while continuing to explore technical pathways for optimization. This feature remains a key item under consideration for future iterations, and I’ve documented dealer feedback to ensure their needs are represented as we evolve the solution.

Lessons Learned & Looking Forward

User-Centered Design Matters

Dealer feedback reinforced the importance of designing for real-world workflows, not assumptions. Keeping adoption top-of-mind helped guide design decisions throughout the project.

Balancing Constraints with Impact

Platform limitations required pivoting features like route optimization. Collaborating closely with product and engineering allowed us to deliver an MVP while documenting enhancements for future iterations.

Future Opportunities

The GeoFence feature continues to evolve. Next steps include exploring technical solutions for optimization, expanding usability testing, and measuring adoption and efficiency once the feature is live.

← Mobile Service Scheduling